TCL 40 NxtPaper vs TCL 50 SE
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
TCL 40 NxtPaper
Price coming soon
TCL 50 SE
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Even
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Even
Better display
Even
Lighter body
Even
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 6.78 | 6.78 |
| Panel Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 2460 | 2460 |
| Resolution Width | 1080 | 1080 |
| Refresh Rate | 90 | 90 |
| Peak Brightness | — | 550 |
| PPI | 396 | 396 |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 | 86 |
Platform
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| Chipset Name | Helio G88 | Mediatek Helio G88 |
| Process (nm) | 12 | 12 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 13 | 14 |
Memory
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Variants | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Count | 3 | 2 |
| Lens | 5 MP, f/2.2 | — |
| Macro | 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Wide | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide) |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Features | — | HDR |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 32 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2, (wide) |
Battery
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 5010 | 5010 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired Charging (W) | 33 | 33 |
Body
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Build | — | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 168.2 | 168.2 |
| Thickness (mm) | 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Weight (g) | 195 | 195 |
| Width (mm) | 75.3 | 75.5 |
Launch
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 29 | 2024, February 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2024, April 08 |
Network
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 900, 1700(AWS), 1900, 2100 | HSDPA 850, 900, 1700(AWS), 1900, 2100 |
| 4G Bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
Connectivity
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB Type | Type-C | Type-C |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
Sound
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
Features
| Spec | TCL 40 NxtPaper | TCL 50 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both TCL 40 NxtPaper and TCL 50 SE are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple