- Home
- Compare Phones
- Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 vs Samsung Galaxy Young S6310
Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 vs Samsung Galaxy Young S6310
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.

Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670
Price coming soon

Samsung Galaxy Young S6310
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670
Better display
Samsung Galaxy Young S6310
Lighter body
Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 3.3 | 3.27 |
| Resolution Height | 320 | 480 |
| Resolution Width | 240 | 320 |
| PPI | 121 | 176 |
| Screen-to-body | 50 | 49.7 |
Platform
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 600 MHz | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A5 |
| GPU | — | Adreno 200 |
| Chipset Name | — | Qualcomm MSM7227A Snapdragon S1 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 2.2 | 4.1.2 |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot), 2 GB included | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Variants | 0.15625GB 0.2734375GB RAM | — |
Main Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 320p@15fps | 480p@24fps |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 5 MP | 3.15 MP, f/2.6 |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1350 | 1300 |
| Chemistry | — | Li-Ion |
| stand by | Up to 642 h (2G) / Up to 421 h (3G) | Up to 250 h (3G) |
| talk time | Up to 10 h 40 min (2G) / Up to 6 h 40 min (3G) | Up to 6 h 40 min (3G) |
Body
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Single SIM (Mini-SIM) or Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Height (mm) | 110.2 | 109.4 |
| Thickness (mm) | 12.6 | 12.5 |
| Weight (g) | 108 | 112 |
| Width (mm) | 61.2 | 58.6 |
Launch
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2011, January. Released 2011, March | 2013, February. Released 2013, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - S6310 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 900, 2100 | HSDPA 900, 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA 7.2/0.384 Mbps | HSPA 7.2/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA | GSM, HSPA |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 3 |
| NFC | — | No |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 | Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 |
|---|---|---|
| browser | HTML | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 and Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 packs a 1350 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 5 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi


Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple