- Home
- Compare Phones
- Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 vs Posh Kick X511
Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 vs Posh Kick X511
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.

Posh Kick Pro LTE L520
Price coming soon

Posh Kick X511
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Posh Kick Pro LTE L520
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Posh Kick Pro LTE L520
Better display
Posh Kick Pro LTE L520
Lighter body
Posh Kick Pro LTE L520
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 5 | 5 |
| Panel Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 1280 | 960 |
| Resolution Width | 720 | 540 |
| PPI | 294 | 220 |
| Screen-to-body | 67.6 | 66.2 |
Platform
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| GPU | Mali-T720MP2 | Mali-400MP2 |
| Chipset Name | Mediatek MT6735P | Mediatek MT6582M |
| Process (nm) | 28 | 28 |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 6.0 | 4.4.2 |
Memory
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC | microSDHC |
| Variants | 8GB 1GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 8 MP | 5 MP |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 1 | — |
| Lens | 5 MP | — |
Battery
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 2000 | 1600 |
| Chemistry | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| stand by | — | Up to 400 h (2G) / Up to 240 h (3G) |
| talk time | — | Up to 5 h (2G) / Up to 4 h (3G) |
Body
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM/ Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Height (mm) | 142.5 | 144.5 |
| Thickness (mm) | 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Weight (g) | 130 | 160 |
| Width (mm) | 71.5 | 72 |
Launch
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2015, November. Released 2016, April | 2015, May. Released 2015, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 1700(AWS), 1900, 2100 | HSDPA 850, 1900 - X511A |
| 4G Bands | 2, 4, 7, 17 | — |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA |
Connectivity
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4 | 4 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
Features
| Spec | Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 | Posh Kick X511 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 and Posh Kick X511 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 packs a 2000 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Posh Kick Pro LTE L520 reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 8 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi


Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple