- Home
- Compare Phones
- Posh Kick Lite S410 vs Posh Pegasus Plus C351
Posh Kick Lite S410 vs Posh Pegasus Plus C351
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.

Posh Kick Lite S410
Price coming soon

Posh Pegasus Plus C351
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Posh Kick Lite S410
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Posh Kick Lite S410
Better display
Posh Kick Lite S410
Lighter body
Posh Pegasus Plus C351
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 4 | 3.5 |
| Panel Type | IPS LCD | — |
| Resolution Height | 800 | 480 |
| Resolution Width | 480 | 320 |
| PPI | 233 | 165 |
| Screen-to-body | 58.2 | 51 |
Platform
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 | 1.0 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| GPU | Mali-400 | Mali-400 |
| Chipset Name | Mediatek MT6572M | Spreadtrum SC6815 |
| Process (nm) | 28 | — |
| OS Name | Android | Android |
| OS Version | 4.4.2 | 4.4.2 |
Memory
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | microSDHC | microSDHC |
| Variants | 4GB 0.5GB RAM | 0.5GB 0.25GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 720p@30fps | 480p@30fps |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | — |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 2 MP | 1.3 MP |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| Count | — | 1 |
| Lens | — | 1.3 MP |
Battery
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1450 | 1100 |
| Chemistry | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| stand by | Up to 400 h (2G) / Up to 240 h (3G) | Up to 400 h |
| talk time | Up to 5 h (2G) / Up to 3 h (3G) | Up to 16 h |
Body
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM/ Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM/ Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Height (mm) | 123.3 | 116 |
| Thickness (mm) | 12.2 | 11.3 |
| Weight (g) | 119 | 100 |
| Width (mm) | 63.5 | 61.6 |
Launch
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2015, May. Released 2015, August | 2014, June. Released 2014, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, 1700(AWS), 1900 - S410A | — |
| edge | — | Yes |
| gprs | — | Yes |
| Speed | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps | — |
| Technology | GSM, HSPA | GSM |
Connectivity
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4 | 2.1 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
Features
| Spec | Posh Kick Lite S410 | Posh Pegasus Plus C351 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Posh Kick Lite S410 and Posh Pegasus Plus C351 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Posh Kick Lite S410 packs a 1450 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Posh Kick Lite S410 reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 2 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi


Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple