- Home
- Compare Phones
- Nokia 300 Charge vs Nokia 702T
Nokia 300 Charge vs Nokia 702T
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.

Nokia 300 Charge
Price coming soon

Nokia 702T
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Nokia 300 Charge
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Even
Better display
Nokia 702T
Lighter body
Nokia 702T
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 2.4 | 2.46 |
| Resolution Height | 320 | 480 |
| Resolution Width | 240 | 640 |
| PPI | 167 | 325 |
| Glass Type | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Screen-to-body | 23.7 | 26.5 |
Platform
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | — | 680 MHz ARM 11 |
| Chipset Name | Unisoc SC6531E | — |
Memory
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | — | microSDHC (dedicated slot) |
| callrecords | Yes | — |
| cardslot | microSDHC | — |
| phonebook | Yes | — |
| Variants | 0.00390625GB 0.00390625GB RAM | 8GB 0.25GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| Video | — | 720p@25fps |
| Features | — | Dual-LED flash |
| Count | — | 1 |
| Lens | — | 8 MP |
| no | QVGA | — |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| unknown | No | — |
Battery
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 3700 | 1200 |
| music play | — | Up to 72 h |
| stand by | — | Up to 360 h (2G) / Up to 360 h (3G) |
| talk time | — | Up to 5 h 20 min (2G) / Up to 7 h 40 min (3G) |
| Wired Charging (W) | 10 | — |
Body
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) | Mini-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 136.6 | 117.1 |
| keyboard | — | QWERTY |
| Thickness (mm) | 15 | 10 |
| unknown | Dedicated LED flashlight (on top) | — |
| Weight (g) | 138 | 127 |
| Width (mm) | 55 | 60.4 |
Launch
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026, August 21 | 2011, June. Released 2011, Q3 |
| Status | Coming soon. Exp. release 2026, August | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | — | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 2gbands | GSM 900, 1800 | — |
| 3G Bands | — | TD-SCDMA |
| edge | Yes | Yes |
| gprs | Yes | Yes |
| Speed | — | HSPA |
| Technology | GSM | GSM |
Connectivity
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | — | 3 |
| NFC | No | — |
| Positioning | No | GPS, A-GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Stereo FM radio, RDS |
| USB Type | Type-C | — |
| USB Version | — | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | — | Yes |
| 3 5mmjack | Yes | — |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Nokia 300 Charge | Nokia 702T |
|---|---|---|
| games | Yes | — |
| java | No | — |
| messaging | SMS | — |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| unknown | MP3 player | — |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Nokia 300 Charge and Nokia 702T are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Nokia 300 Charge packs a 3700 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Other popular comparisons


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi


Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google


Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple