Microsoft Kin ONEm vs Microsoft Lumia 435
Side-by-side specs and price comparison for buyers in Algeria.
Microsoft Kin ONEm
Price coming soon
Microsoft Lumia 435
Price coming soon
Quick Verdict
Who wins each category, side by side.
Better price
Even
Faster chip
Even
Bigger battery
Microsoft Lumia 435
Faster charging
Even
Higher-resolution camera
Microsoft Kin ONEm
Better display
Microsoft Lumia 435
Lighter body
Even
Best value for money
Even
Full specs comparison
Display
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Size (inches) | 2.6 | 4 |
| Panel Type | — | IPS LCD |
| Resolution Height | 240 | 800 |
| Resolution Width | 320 | 480 |
| PPI | 154 | 233 |
| Screen-to-body | 36.8 | 59.6 |
Platform
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 600MHz ARM 11 | Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| GPU | — | Adreno 302 |
| Chipset Name | Nvidia Tegra | Qualcomm MSM8210 Snapdragon 200 |
| Process (nm) | — | 28 |
Memory
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Card Slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| call records | Practically unlimited | — |
| phonebook | Practically unlimited entries and fields, Photocal | — |
| Variants | 4GB 0.25GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
Main Camera
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | 480p@30fps | 480p@30fps |
| Features | Dual-LED flash | — |
| Count | 1 | 1 |
| Lens | 5 MP | 2 MP, f/2.7, 36mm |
Selfie Camera
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Video | — | 480p |
Battery
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity (mAh) | 1240 | 1560 |
| Chemistry | — | Li-Ion |
| music play | — | Up to 64 h |
| stand by | Up to 210 h | Up to 504 h (2G) / Up to 504 h (3G) |
| talk time | Up to 5 h 40 min | Up to 21 h (2G) / Up to 11 h 45 min (3G) |
Body
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Micro-SIM |
| Height (mm) | 84.1 | 118.1 |
| keyboard | QWERTY | — |
| Thickness (mm) | 18.5 | 11.7 |
| Weight (g) | — | 134.1 |
| Width (mm) | 67.6 | 64.7 |
Launch
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2010, November. Released 2010, November | 2015, January. Released 2015, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Network
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| 2G Bands | CDMA 800, 1900 | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 |
| 3G Bands | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | HSDPA 900, 2100 |
| Speed | EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | CDMA, EVDO | GSM, HSPA |
Connectivity
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.1 | 4 |
| NFC | — | No |
| Positioning | GPS, A-GPS | A-GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | FM radio, RDS |
| USB Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 3 | Wi-Fi 4 |
Sound
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
Features
| Spec | Microsoft Kin ONEm | Microsoft Lumia 435 |
|---|---|---|
| browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML | — |
| games | Yes + downloadable | — |
| java | Yes, MIDP 2.1 | — |
| messaging | SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, Push Email | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
Buying advice for Algeria
Both Microsoft Kin ONEm and Microsoft Lumia 435 are sold in Algeria, but they fit different priorities.
Microsoft Lumia 435 packs a 1560 mAh battery, which translates to longer screen-on time when you are away from a charger.
Microsoft Kin ONEm reaches a higher main-sensor resolution at 5 MP, which helps with crops and lower-light photos.
Other popular comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Samsung compared to Apple
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Samsung compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Samsung compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Apple compared to Xiaomi
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Apple compared to Google
Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Apple iPhone 17
Samsung compared to Apple